To Board Of American Lorain Corp: Reject The CEO's Offer

Back in April 2012, I wrote an article about what I thought was an estimate of the value of American Lorain Corp. (ALN) , the initial results were for a range going from 8.44$ to as high as 32.53$. Since then I revised down my estimate of the value of the company and I will elaborate on this point later.

First, let's examine some worrying facts. On October 15th Mr. Si Chen, chairman and CEO of American Lorain Corp submitted "a preliminary, non-binding proposal letter", in which he publicized his intention "to acquire all of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company not currently owned by Mr. Chen at a proposed price of $1.6 per ordinary share, in cash, subject to certain conditions. Mr. Chen currently beneficially owns, in the aggregate, approximately 46.5% of the Company's outstanding ordinary shares."

A very disturbing fact about this proposal is that the independent committee that has been set up to analyze it, composed of Mr. Dekai Yin, Mr. Tad M. Ballantyne and Mr. Maoquan Wei; Mr. Yin as its chairman, is far from independent. In fact the independent committee held no shares in the company as of their last Form 3 filings according to the SEC, how can they related to the other shareholders of the company who have no influence on the company?

For the shareholders who have not read it, the official proposal letter can be found here. The Board will have to enter a delicate exercise to make sure they extract fair value for the remaining shareholders and that they do not unfairly disadvantage the shareholders other than Mr. Chen.

Using pretty much the same format used in my previous article, let's see how much this offer is ridiculously low compared to the current intrinsic value of American Lorain Corp.

Assuming the current P/E ratio of 2.31, the current price assumes that the undiscounted earnings of American Lorain will grow by a little over 3% over the next 5 years, giving us a 2017 price of 1.60$, so the assumed figure of the CEO's proposal is actually lower. Public information tells us that earnings have been growing at about 24.8% a year over the past 7 years. Let's make another assumption that American Lorain is only able to grow EPS at 10% per annum. We find ourselves with a 2017 price of 2.35$ per share with the current P/E ratio. According to Reuters, the industry's average P/E stands at 34, but even with a ratio of 10 in 2017, American Lorain would be worth around 10$ per share.

From another standpoint, American Lorain has managed to grow its book value per share over the past 7 years at an average rate of 35% per year. Assuming the pace slows down to 20% as the company gets bigger, we end up with a book value of 13.58$ per share in 2017. If we use the current incredibly depressed Price/Book ratio of 0.26, we end up with a price per share of 3.53$. If we compare once again to the industry, we see that the average Price/Book ratio is close to 5. Using an alarmingly conservative Price/Book ratio of 1 for the year 2017, we obtain a value of 28$ per share.

Finally, as of June 30th 2012, the book value of the company amounted to 4.79$ per share, which is a 245% premium over the closing price as of October 15th 2012, or a 316% premium over the referenced October 8th closing price. The Board therefore should categorically reject the offer. Accepting the offer would be a blatant case of conflict of interest and negligence of the right of shareholders that are not insiders. Mr. Chen must have insulting levels of chutzpah to try to acquire a company he knows currently incredibly undervalued.

(click to enlarge)

In my opinion, if they intend to accept the offer, the Board could still give at most a 30% discount to Mr. Chen and offer shareholders a meager 3.35$ per share, this would be less insolent. His attempt is clearly an insult to the intelligence of the company's shareholders. I still err on the side of the book value of the company as a starting offer to shareholders.

Disclosure: I am long ALN. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

The Fed Is Growing the US Money Supply, So What?

As speculation grows surrounding the upcoming September 13th 2012 Fed meeting and whether or not there will be another round of quantitative easing to boost the economy, it is interesting to stop for a moment and examine how the M1 money supply has evolved over the past 30 years.

This chart provided by the St. Louis Fed gives a good glimpse at how the M1 money supply has evolved in the recent decades. It simply shows the money stock at the end of each month since August 20th 1982 in billions of dollars.

As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words and I thought it would be interesting to have a visual representation of how far we have come since the 2007 financial crisis. The last two rounds of quantitative easing have almost doubled the M1 money supply in as little as 4 years. One only has to wonder what will be the long term effect of going from 1.4 trillion to 2.4 trillion USD on the dollar. Even if it is currently the world reserve currency, it is obvious the US Dollar is bound loose value in the coming years. How is your portfolio positioned assuming such a scenario? Soon enough the world will notice that they are getting less and less value for their US Dallar holdings. Food for tought....

China Ceramics Co Ltd. (NASDAQ:CCCL); Taking Advantage of the Chinese Real Estate Boom

Following in the recent series of fantastic chinese companies, a new comer has been suggested by Omit Majumdar, a colleague of mine. The company has surged as an interesting opportunity for investors who want to position themselves to take advantage the prevailing economic environment in China.

As the construction boom beats relentlessly because of increased demand, the chinese consumers are looking to own home more akin to those available to the western countries. This is proving to be a great bonanza for companies involved in the construction business. Many chinese companies listed on US stock exchanges are still plague by the financial reporting scandals and are currently trading at multiples to their fundamentals low enough to make investors pant like Pavlov's dog.

As per Reuters, China Ceramics Co., Ltd. (China Ceramics), incorporated on June 22, 2007, is a manufacturer of ceramic tiles. These ceramic tiles are used for exterior siding and for interior flooring and design in residential and commercial buildings. The ceramic tiles, sold under the Hengda (HD), Hengdeli (HDL), TOERTO and WULIQIAO brands are available in over two thousand styles, colors and size combinations. China Ceramics has six principal product categories: porcelain tiles, glazed tiles, glazed porcelain tiles, rustic tiles, ultra-thin tiles and polished glazed tiles. Porcelain tiles are the Company’s major products and accounted for over 68.4% % of its total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2011. Ceramic tiles are used in the People's Republic of China (PRC) as a construction material for residential and commercial buildings. Ceramic tiles are used for flooring, interior walls for decorative purposes and on exterior siding.

China Ceramics manufacturing facilities operated as Jinjiang Hengda Ceramics Co., Ltd. are located in Jinjiang, Fujian Province, and its manufacturing facilities operated as Jiangxi Hengdali Ceramic Materials Co., Ltd. are located in Gaoan, Jiangxi Province. As of December 31, 2011, these facilities provided an aggregate annual production capacity of approximately 52 million square meters. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had twelve production lines. The Company primarily sells its products through a distributor network or directly to property developers.

The most recent financial data shows that the company has grown it's earnings from RMB 101M in 2006 to RMB 294M as of FY 2011. This is tremendous growth for a company operating in a real estate market that is showing anything but signs of slowing down while having little cues of overheating like we are currently experiencing in North America.

If we look at the historical performance of the company from a US perspective, it is obvious that the company is growing at a fast pace. The current trend also tells us that earnings will still be impressive even if the company does not grow as the chinese RMB will continue to appreciate compared to the USD in the foreseeable future. The company has a big free cash flow problem because it is aggressively reinvesting in it's growth, but other fundamentals of the company show that as soon as chinese companies start being valued adequately by the market it shall offer an interesting return for it's shareholders at current prices.

Disclosure: The Author is Long CCCL

Wood Composite Technologies Inc: The Last Cigar-Butt Company?

When Warren buffett started his partnership, he used to for cigar-butt companies. By that meaning, as Benjamin Graham tried to find before him, firms that were not very popular but still had one last puff of earnings or value to give to shareholders and that offered themselves at a valuation attractive enough to make them seem almost free.

It seems it is still possible to find companies with such caracteristics. Just looking at the latest quarterly filing will make you wonder why there are not more people jumping at this company.

According to Reuters, Wood Composite Technologies Inc. develops, manufactures and sells composite decking products. The Company’s products include decking boards and a variety of decking trims and fascia suitable for residential and commercial decking and dock purposes, which were manufactured on site in Nisku, Alberta. The Company markets these products throughout Canada and the United States to retail consumers and building contractors through various building supply dealers and wholesalers. It distributes the product in Canada under the brand name of Millennium Decking Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary while Millennium Decking (USA) Inc. acts as its marketing entity in the United States.

The first point of interest here is that the company is trading under cash on hand per share. Indeed as of the last quarterly filing dated may 24th 2012 of the company has 3.7 Millions CAD in cash on hand.

Another interesting fact here is that the company also has 17 millions CAD of carried forward unused losses that are set to expire in the next five years. This is very attractive for a company willing to by them for that pursposes only, without even considering the current cash hoard. At the minimum 15% marginal tax rate available for Canadian corporations, this represents about CAD 2.6 Million in cumulative potential savings from the point of view of a company willing the bid on the company.

With 74,205,825 shares outstanding, we can establish two different values for the firm. One that just considers a liquidation and distribution of the company's cash in the form of a liquidating dividend. This would value the company at 0.048$ per share. Another way to value the company would take the perspective of an acquirer looking for a way to save on taxes in the future. From such a perspective, the company would be worth at most 0.083$ per share.

As of June 15th 2012, the shares traded at an ask price of 0.03$ per share. An investor positioning himself today has the potential to realize a profit ranging 60% in the case of a liquidation to 177% in the case of an acquisition, which will certainly materialize over the next year. With most investments providing meaningless risk-free returns, it will be beneficial for current and potential shareholders to press the company to realize the full value of the company on the August 7th Shareholders meeting as it has completely stopped it's operating activities with the recent sale of it's Nisku plant.

Disclosure: The Author is Long WCT.V